Changing the Face of Wars: A Case Study of Indo-Pak Textbooks Tahir Khan

Abstract

This comparative study critically examines how the Indo-Pakistan wars of 1965 and 1971 are portrayed in Indian and Pakistani History and Social Science textbooks. It emphasizes the influence of state nationalism in shaping selective and one-sided narratives, which often distort historical truths and omit diverse perspectives. The research aims to scrutinize the content of textbooks from both nations, identifying instances of bias, factual inaccuracies, and the implications for students' historical understanding. By focusing on the glorification of wars and its impact on critical thinking, the study highlights the tendency of textbooks to present violence as the primary solution or ultimate bravery, thereby limiting nuanced debate and alternative viewpoints. The objectives include comparing narrative structures, pinpointing distortions, assessing educational impacts on students' perceptions of conflict, and advocating for a more balanced and objective approach in history education. This approach seeks to promote pluralism, encourage critical analysis of dominant narratives, and foster a deeper comprehension of the complexities surrounding war and peace.